Home › Topics › Peripherals & Equipment Requests › Home Office

Home-Office Equipment: What the Organisation Provides

Wednesday, 11:20, at Carrow Analytics, a consultancy where about half the staff work from home most of the week. Ben leads the desk of three and has two tickets open side by side. The first is from Amira, an analyst who started remotely a fortnight ago: "What am I allowed to order for home? Tom said he got a chair." The second is from Tom's manager, asking the desk to "sort out" a monitor for someone on her team. That person has already bought one, found it does not work with the laptop's dock, and would like to be reimbursed. She would also like it to work. Ben searches the ticket history for "chair" and finds that Tom did get one, eighteen months ago. A finance director who has since left approved it under a scheme that nobody wrote down. There is no policy. There are precedents, and the precedents are about to become the policy whether Ben writes one or not.

A home-office equipment policy says what the organisation provides for people working from home, what it reimburses, and what stays personal. It says who owns each thing, how it gets there, what happens when it breaks, and what comes back when the person leaves. It does this in plain words and on one page. It is a short document with a long reach, because every sentence in it will be read by someone who wants a different answer. This article is part of our Peripherals & Equipment Requests series. The wider job of supporting people who are never in the building belongs to Supporting Remote Workers. This article is about the kit.

It covers why precedent is not a policy, then the three buckets: provided, reimbursed and personal. Next come who owns what and what ownership means, getting it there, and the ergonomic question at a distance, handled kindly. Repair and swap by post, the return at the end, and writing the policy and keeping it to a page follow. Then come a short war story and the home-office equipment policy to copy, in that order.

Why Precedent Is Not a Policy

Tom's chair became a right the moment a second person heard about it, and that is the whole problem with precedent. An exception made once, for good reasons, by someone with authority, is remembered as the rule by everyone who was not in the room. The desk inherits it as a ticket: "Tom got one." The desk cannot say Tom did not, because the ticket history says he did. It cannot say the rule has changed, because there was never a rule. It can only decide, on a Wednesday, under time pressure, whether Amira gets a chair. Whatever it decides is the next precedent. The desk has become the author of a furniture policy, one ticket at a time, without once being asked to write it.

The second problem with precedent is that it is unfair in a way nobody intended. Tom asked; the people who did not know they could ask did not. Equipment may go to the people who think to request it, and not to the people who assume they are not entitled. In that case, it is distributed by confidence, and confidence is not evenly shared. A written policy that everyone can read turns "Tom got one" into "everyone working from home more than two days a week gets the standard kit". Amira could have read that sentence on her first day. The policy is as much about the people who never ask as the people who do.

The third problem is the one that landed on Ben's second ticket. Without a policy, people buy their own, reasonably, and then ask for two things at once: the money back and for the thing to work. The desk can usually do neither. Reimbursement is finance's decision. The monitor bought at the weekend was never going to work with the standard dock without an adapter the desk does not stock. A policy that says in advance what is provided removes the reason to buy. A policy that says what is reimbursed removes the surprise when the answer is nothing. It does not remove the conversation. It makes it a short one.

The Three Buckets: Provided, Reimbursed, Personal

Every item a person might use at home falls into one of three buckets, and the policy's main job is to name which. Provided means the organisation buys it, ships it, owns it, supports it and takes it back. That covers the laptop, the dock, the standard monitor, the keyboard, the mouse and the headset. It is the same standard kit the person would have at a desk in the building. Reimbursed means the person buys it, the organisation pays some or all of the cost back through expenses, and the person owns it. This bucket is for things the desk will never support: a chair, a desk, a lamp. Whether this bucket exists at all is a decision for finance and HR rather than the desk. Personal means the person's own: the printer, the second monitor they already had, the household network, the room.

The provided bucket is the desk's bucket, and it is simply the equipment standard applied at a distance. The items are the same models as in the building, chosen for the same reasons and stocked on the same shelf. They are issued through the same form, with "home address on record" as the delivery option. There is no separate home-office catalogue. And there should not be, because a second catalogue is a second set of spares, a second troubleshooting card and a second debate. What the standard is and how to hold it is in Equipment Standards That End the Monitor Debate. The home-office policy points to it rather than copying it.

The reimbursed bucket is where most policies go wrong, by letting it overlap with the provided one. A policy that reimburses monitors produces twenty-three different monitors, which is the war story later in this article. A policy that provides the standard monitor and reimburses nothing the desk would have to plug in keeps the chain intact. The rule is that reimbursement is for things with no cable to the laptop. A chair has no cable. A monitor does. That one test sorts nearly every request, and it is the sentence Ben wrote first.

ItemBucketWho owns itWho supports itComes back at the end?
Laptop, dock, standard monitor, keyboard, mouse, headsetProvidedThe organisationThe desk, by post and remote toolsYes, all of it
Laptop charger, laptop-to-dock cable, video cableProvidedThe organisationThe desk; a spare cable ships in the kitYes, except worn cables the policy names
Item named by an ergonomic assessmentProvidedThe organisationThe desk, for the parts it would support anywayYes
Chair, desk, lamp, footrestReimbursed, if the organisation offers itThe personNobody at the deskNo
Printer, second monitor the person already had, speakersPersonalThe personNobody at the deskNo
Household internet, router, the roomPersonalThe personThe desk will triage the connection, not the householdNo

Who Owns What, and What Ownership Means

Ownership sounds like a legal nicety and is in fact the thing that decides every later question. A provided item is on the organisation's inventory sheet against the person's name, with its asset tag, from the day it ships. It is supported by the desk, repaired or swapped by the desk, and covered by whatever insurance the organisation holds for its equipment. It comes back when the person leaves or the item is replaced. A reimbursed item is the person's: not on the inventory, not supported, not insured by the organisation, and not returned. That is why the reimbursed bucket must contain nothing the desk would ever be asked to fix. The policy says which bucket each item is in. The ticket for each provided item says the tag, which is the sentence that makes the return at the end possible.

Ownership also answers the question nobody asks until it matters: what happens when the thing is damaged at home. A provided monitor knocked off a desk by a child is the organisation's monitor. The desk replaces it the way it would replace one dropped in the office, without a conversation about blame. The alternative is a person working on a laptop screen out of embarrassment. A reimbursed chair that breaks is the person's chair. The policy says both of those in one line each, kindly, before anything has fallen off anything.

The household network sits in the personal bucket with an asterisk, and the asterisk needs a sentence. The desk does not own, supply or support the person's router or their internet service. But it does need to know whether the laptop can reach the organisation's systems from that network. That means the desk will triage the connection as far as the laptop and no further. Where that line falls, and what the desk does when the household's wireless is the problem, is in What the Desk Supports at Home. The policy need only say that the network is the person's and point to that line.

Getting It There

Provided equipment reaches the home by post, and the desk's part of that is small and specific. The kit is built from stock and boxed with a spare laptop-to-dock cable. The cable is the thing most likely to be missing or wrong. The kit is labelled with the ticket number inside and out. It is sent to the address on the person's record, never to an address given in the ticket. The tracking reference goes on the ticket. The person is told the day it ships and the day it should arrive. The resolving message asks them to reply when it is set up and working. The courier process itself, the box that is always ready and the swap-by-post, belong to Shipping and Swapping Hardware. This article needs only the three facts the policy states: it ships to the address on record, the ticket carries the tracking, and the person confirms receipt.

The address on record matters more than it looks. Equipment sent to "my partner's flat, it's easier" is equipment whose location the organisation cannot later state. The return at the end becomes a search. HR's record is the address; a person who has moved updates HR first and the desk ships second. It takes a day. It is worth the day.

The confirmation closes the loop and starts the record. "Arrived, set up, both monitors working" is the moment the inventory sheet's row becomes true. A reply that says "arrived but the video cable is missing" is the moment the same ticket should reopen rather than a new one start. The shipment, the tag and the address are all on the first ticket. In QuerySolv a requester's reply reopens a resolved ticket, as it does in many tools. Where yours does not, link the new ticket to the old one so that the box's whole story stays in one place.

The Ergonomic Question at a Distance, Handled Kindly

The ergonomic request from home is the same request as in the office with one difference. The assessor cannot walk over, and the person cannot borrow a riser from the next desk. The route is the same, an assessment through HR or the occupational health service, often by video or a questionnaire for remote staff. The desk's job is the same: name the route warmly, start it, and provide what the assessment names. In the meantime send the best thing in stock. What changes is the meantime. A person in the building can have the larger monitor on their desk in an hour; a person at home waits for the post. So the interim kit should go out the day the request arrives, not the day the assessment finishes.

The buckets handle the awkward part. Equipment named by an assessment is provided, not reimbursed, even when it is something the policy would otherwise put in the reimbursed bucket. An assessed need is the organisation's responsibility to meet and the person should not be fronting the cost of it. A chair named by an assessment is therefore an organisation purchase, shipped like any provided item. The policy says so in a line. That way, the person with the back problem is not reading a reimbursement clause and wondering whether they can afford to be assessed. The ticket, as in the office, records "assessed; items named by the assessment" and nothing about why.

Repair and Swap by Post

A provided peripheral that fails at home is diagnosed over chat or a call and fixed by post. The first step is the same as in the building: the cable. The kit shipped with a spare laptop-to-dock cable for this reason. "Try the spare cable from the box" resolves a good share of home dock tickets before anything is sent. When the fault survives the spare cable, the swap goes by post, with the replacement sent first. The faulty item comes back in the same box with the return label the policy promised. The person is never without a monitor while a monitor is in the post. The dock chain and the swap order are in the fourth article in this series and apply unchanged at home. At home, "the technician's bag" becomes "the spare in the box and the courier".

The policy sets the turnaround for a home swap honestly, as the courier's time plus a day each way. It says that a person whose laptop fails gets a loaner by courier the next working day. The stock that makes that promise keepable is the third article in this series. The policy also says, in a sentence, which small items are not worth sending back: a worn mouse, a frayed cable, a headset whose ear pads have gone. Those are replaced by post and the old one is disposed of at home. The postage to return them costs more in everyone's time than the item is worth. The policy saying so saves a hundred tickets asking.

The Return at the End

Everything in the provided bucket comes back when the person leaves. The policy says so on the day the kit ships, in the same message that says it has shipped. That way, the return at the end is a reminder rather than news. The mechanics of the return belong to Getting the Equipment Back. That includes the courier kit, the return label, the signed receipt and what to do when a laptop does not come back. The home-office policy simply points there. What the policy adds is the list. The inventory row against the person's name, built from the issue tickets, is the list of what the organisation expects in the box. The leaver is sent it, with the tags, so that nobody has to remember whether there were two monitors or one.

The return also covers the items that do not come back, by name. That way, the leaver is not posting a frayed cable at the organisation's expense. The policy's "not worth returning" line does that work. The return covers the reimbursed and personal items by saying nothing about them, which is the point of the buckets. The chair was the person's from the day it was bought, and the return letter does not mention it.

Remember: provided means the organisation buys it, ships it to the address on record, owns it, supports it by post and takes it back. Reimbursed means the person owns it and the desk never touches it. Anything with a cable to the laptop is provided or personal, never reimbursed. The assessed need is always provided, with nothing about why on the ticket.

Writing the Policy and Keeping It to a Page

The policy is one page, agreed by three people, the desk lead, someone from HR and someone from finance. And it is written by the desk lead because the desk is the function that will be asked about it every week. HR owns the sentence about who qualifies, which is usually a number of days a week at home or a contract type. Finance owns the reimbursement sentence, if there is one, and its cap. The desk owns everything else. The policy is reviewed once a year alongside the equipment standard, because the two move together. Between reviews it is changed only when the standard changes.

Publish it where the people it concerns can read it before they need to, which means where a new starter will find it in their first week. If you run QuerySolv, a knowledge base article visible to everyone, linked from the equipment request form, does the job. The starter reads what they get, raises the form, and the kit ships. The policy that lives in a folder on a drive is not a policy. It is the thing the desk sends people after they have bought the wrong monitor. Keep it to a page. If it needs a second page, it has started explaining the reasons, and the reasons belong in a conversation, not a document.

A Short War Story: The Reimbursed Monitors at Acme

Acme announced, with good intentions and no desk involvement, that staff working from home could claim back the cost of a monitor. Within a quarter twenty-three people had bought twenty-three monitors of nineteen different kinds. Dana ran Acme's desk of two. She found that eleven monitors did not work with the standard dock without an adapter. Four needed a kind of cable the desk had never stocked, and two could not be driven at a usable size at all. She spent roughly thirty hours over the following quarter sourcing adapters and cables for monitors the organisation did not own and had never chosen. She spent a further hour a week explaining that a monitor people had been reimbursed for was, in the desk's terms, personal and unsupported. Nobody who had just been reimbursed for it found that persuasive. The scheme was withdrawn and replaced with the standard monitor shipped from stock. The twenty-three legacy monitors wore out over three years, each one a ticket. Reimburse the chair, Dana wrote in the policy; provide anything with a cable.

The Home-Office Equipment Policy

The policy below is the one Ben wrote the week of the two tickets. It is built to be read by the person at home rather than by the desk. It has plain sentences, the three buckets named, and the awkward questions answered before they are asked. Section A is who qualifies, which HR fills in. Section B is the three buckets, with the items in each. Copy your standard items into the provided list rather than inventing a home version. Section C is the practical part, shipping, breakage, repair and return, in one line each. Section D is the reimbursement sentence, which finance fills in or strikes out, and the ergonomic sentence, which nobody strikes out.

HOME-OFFICE EQUIPMENT POLICY — ONE PAGE
Owner: ______________   Agreed with HR: ______________   Agreed with finance: ______________   Review date: ____________

A. WHO THIS APPLIES TO
   Staff working from home ____ or more days a week, or on a contract HR designates as remote.

B. THE THREE BUCKETS
   PROVIDED (the organisation buys, ships, owns, supports and takes back)
     Laptop and charger; dock with its cable and power brick; standard monitor with video cable;
     keyboard; mouse; headset; a spare laptop-to-dock cable in the box.
     Same models as in the office: see the equipment standard sheet. No separate home catalogue.
     Requested through the equipment request form; delivered to the address HR holds for you.
   REIMBURSED (bought by the person, paid back up to the cap in section D, owned by the person)
     Chair; desk; desk lamp; footrest. Nothing that plugs into the laptop.
     Claimed through expenses, not through the desk. Not supported, not insured, not returned.
   PERSONAL (owned by the person; the desk does not supply or support it)
     Printer; any monitor or peripheral you already owned; speakers; your internet service and router.
     The desk will triage your connection as far as the laptop and no further.

C. THE PRACTICAL PART
   Shipping:   kit ships to the address on your HR record; tracking is on your ticket; reply to the ticket
               when it has arrived and works.
   Breakage:   a provided item damaged at home is replaced like one damaged in the office. Tell the desk.
   Repair:     try the spare cable in the box first; then the desk ships a replacement before the faulty item
               comes back, in the same box, with a return label. Laptop failure: loaner by courier next working day.
   Not worth returning (replace by post, dispose of at home): worn mouse, frayed cable, headset past its ear pads.
   Return:     every provided item on your inventory list comes back when you leave, by the return process;
               the list with tags is sent to you with the return label. Reimbursed and personal items are yours.

D. THE TWO SENTENCES FROM FINANCE AND HR
   Reimbursement cap per person per ______: ______________ (finance). Strike this line if no scheme exists.
   Equipment named by an ergonomic assessment is PROVIDED, whatever bucket it would otherwise be in;
   the assessment route is ______________ (HR). The ticket records only that an assessment was made.

Amira got the standard kit, shipped on Thursday and confirmed working on Monday. Ben had written the sentence in the policy about chairs with Tom in mind. The sentence told Amira that a chair was a claim through expenses up to a cap that finance filled in on Friday. Tom's manager's team member kept the monitor she had bought, as a personal item. The desk shipped her the standard one from stock, which worked with the dock the day it arrived. The adapter conversation never happened. Tom's chair stayed Tom's, under the policy, which is where it had always been. Ben filed the policy in the knowledge base and linked it from the form. The next "what am I allowed" ticket arrived a month later from someone who had read it and was asking only where to put the address.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should we provide a second monitor for people at home?
Apply the same rule as in the office. The standard monitor is provided to everyone who qualifies. A second one goes to roles the role profile names or through the non-standard lane with the manager's approval. Home does not change the standard, it changes the delivery. The one difference worth writing down is that a second monitor at home ships with its own video cable. There is no cupboard to fetch one from.
Someone wants to use their own large monitor instead of the standard one. Can they?
They can, as a personal item, and the policy should say what that means. The desk will not supply an adapter or cable for it and will not troubleshoot it. The desk will send the standard monitor if they want a supported one. Many people are happy with that trade. What the desk must not do is take on support for a monitor it did not choose. Every fault in the chain will then be blamed on the dock.
Who pays when a provided monitor is damaged at home?
The organisation pays, in the same way it would if the monitor fell off a desk in the office. The policy says so in one line so that nobody hides a broken monitor out of embarrassment. Replace it by post and record the old one as retired on the ticket. If the same person damages equipment repeatedly, that is a conversation for their manager, not a charge from the desk.
Do we need to ship to the home address, or can people collect from the office?
Either, and the policy can offer both; collection is cheaper and lets the technician check the kit with the person present. What must not change is the address rule when shipping: the HR record's address, not one typed into a ticket. That way, the organisation can always state where its equipment is. A person who has moved updates HR first and the kit ships the day after.
What do we do about the ergonomic request when we have no occupational health service?
HR names a route. For a small organisation this may be a trained assessor hired for the purpose or a questionnaire-based assessment from a provider HR chooses. The desk's role is to know the route and point to it. In the meantime the desk sends the best interim kit from stock the day the request arrives. When the assessment arrives, the desk provides whatever it names. The desk never judges the need and never records why.
How do we know what a remote leaver has at home?
From the inventory sheet, which has a row per tag against the person's name built from the issue tickets as each item shipped. Send the leaver that list with the return label so that they can check the box against it. Reconcile the returns against the same list when the box arrives. A desk with no issue notes has no list, and the return becomes a guess. That is the strongest argument for writing the note at the moment of issue.

From the QuerySolv team: we build self-hosted help desk software for Windows. QuerySolv runs as one Windows service on your own network. It takes requests by web form, e-mail, live chat, social messages and REST API. It is licensed once per installation rather than per agent per month. The free trial runs the full product for 30 days.