Home › Topics › Technician Docs vs User Docs

Technician Docs vs User Docs

The article explains how to fix the mapped-drive problem. Step four says "open the server console and restart the share service". Step six mentions the admin password's location. It was written by a technician for technicians, which was fine until someone published it to the portal. There, a user in accounts followed it faithfully as far as step three and then phoned to ask what a server console was. Meanwhile the user-facing version, written separately a year earlier, still describes a drive letter that was retired in the spring. Two documents, one procedure, neither right for anyone, and nobody responsible for keeping them in step.

This series is about keeping two documents for two readers without doubling the work. It covers two audiences and two documents, and why one text cannot serve both. It covers writing the runbook, precise and complete, for the technician at 02:00. It covers writing the user guide from the runbook rather than from scratch. Then comes keeping the pair in sync with one source of truth and a change that triggers a review of both. It covers what must never be in the user document, with a leak test before anything is published. And it covers the documentation set a small desk actually needs, which is shorter than you fear. A runbook tells a competent stranger how to fix it. A guide tells a hurried user how to avoid needing one.

Articles in This Series

Explore More Topics

This series is part of the QuerySolv helpdesk topic library. It covers the foundations, processes, communication, knowledge, tooling, metrics, classic ticket domains, people and strategy behind a support desk that works. The library pairs well with the software we build: QuerySolv. It is a self-hosted help desk that runs as one Windows service on your own network. It is licensed once per installation, not per agent per month.